Clarifying Doubts around the fitnah of ibn Haadee

 

http://www.mpubs.org/manhaj/1158-audio-a-series-of-questions-answers-clarifying-doubts-around-the-fitnah-of-muhammad-bin-hadee-question-1-by-the-noble-shaykh-hasan-ibn-abd-al-wahhab-marzooq-al-banna

 

 

Some Statements from Shaikh adh-Dhafeeri’s Refutation of Muhammad al Imaam, introduced by Shaikh Fawzaan

Firstly, a reminder about what Shaikh Rabee said a year agp when he was asked about Shaikh Ubaid al Jaabiree’s declaring Muhammad al Imaam to be an innovator, to which he responded:

( http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=146223 )

“Firstly, it is obligatory upon Muhammad al Imaam to repent to Allaah from this pact”

Then he said,

“I am amazed at the one who seeks to reject the tabdee’ (declaration of one being an innovator) of Shaikh ‘Ubaid for Muhammad al Imaam, but this one doesn’t seek to reject the takfeer (declaring one to be a disbeliever) of some of the Haddaadees (extremists) and Hizbees of myself and Shaikh ‘Ubaid based upon Muhammad al Imaam’s pact”

More statements of the scholars on Muhammad al Imaam’s pact:

https://sughayyirah.wordpress.com/category/teach-children-and-ourselves-islam/aqeedah-and-manhaj/individuals-and-groups-whom-the-scholars-have-criticized/muhammad-al-imaam/

The following are a few sentences translated from the treatise by Shaikh Abdullah bin Sulfeeq adh-Dhafeeri[1] which can be downloaded from here:

http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=154275

Shaikh Saalih Fawzaan said about this treatise by Shaikh Abdullah bin Sulfeeq adh-Dhafeeri:

“I have examined the treatise entitled: ‘Alerting those who possess pure intellects’ by Shaikh Abdullah bin Sulfeeq adh-Dhafeeri – (we ask that) Allaah grants him success – and I found it to be satisfactory with regards to its subject.  So (we ask that) Allaah rewards him with good and brings about benefit by his knowledge”

(p.2 in the pdf viewer)

The following are just a few of the statements of Shaikh Abdullah bin Sulfeeq adh-Dhafeeri from the treatise:

“Firstly, Muhammad al Imaam’s continuing to defend the pact and work by its ratified terms until the present – along with the Yemeni and Saudi governments as well as the governments of the Gulf nations being at war with the Houthis – those (Houthis) who have broken agreements, killed Ahlus Sunnah, betrayed them numerous times and who are supported by Iran which supplies them with weapons and equipment.

“Secondly, the followers of Muhammad al Imaam misguiding the people with fabrications about the noble Shaikh Saalih bin Fawzaan al Fawzaan in saying that he approves of this pact.” (p.4 in the pdf viewer)

Shaikh Abdullah bin Sulfeeq adh-Dhafeeri said:

“The unrestrictiveness of their statement (in the pact): ‘And the absence of war, mutual clashing, fighting, or fitnah no matter what the circumstances or the reasons’

“The unrestrictiveness of this shows foolishness, weakness, and cowardice.  Because it requires and necessitates a lack of fighting the Houthis no matter what they do.  Even if they fight and kill Ahlus Sunnah in all areas of Yemen, or if the (scholars and rulers) of the Muslims of Ahlus Sunnah announce a general call to arms against the Houthis, then Muhammad al Imaam will stick to the pact and won’t fight with his Muslim brothers from Ahlus Sunnah even if jihaad and fighting are considered fard ayn (an individual obligation).

“Likewise it requires that Muhammad al Imaam and whoever is under his leadership stick to this pact and this unrestricted agreement even if there occurs from the Houthis treachery and betrayal.” (p.9 in the pdf viewer)

Shaikh Abdullah bin Sulfeeq adh-Dhafeeri said:

“This is what Muhammad al Imaam has made obligatory with the Houthis which is built upon this agreement which he endorsed – even up until the present.  For indeed on the first jumuah after “Decisive Storm”[2] (started) he rejected this fighting.  This fighting which was a result of the Houthis breaking and betraying their treaties and their international agreement – and he called (this fighting against the Shia Houthis) the fighting of fitnah.  And he continues to be upon this.  He emphasized this in the khutbah he gave on the 15^th of Shawwal 1436H in which he portrayed the fighting which is occurring right now against the (Shia) Houthis as the fighting of fitnah.  And (he mentioned) that whoever left it was the one who had intellect and understanding – and he meant by that himself and his followers.   He mentioned texts and narrations to try to argue that, which shows that he is only someone who memorizes and transmits (the texts) without understanding them.  And that he doesn’t distinguish between the fighting of jihaad against the evil-doers and the fighting of fitnah.” (p.9 in the pdf viewer)

Shaikh Abdullah bin Sulfeeq adh-Dhafeeri said:

“Seventhly, what it contains from far-reaching danger, and that is what some of Muhammad al Imaam’s followers are doing from misguiding the people through their telling lies about Shaikh Saalih Fawzaan that he supports this pact.  And from this is what has come on the website (which will not be named here) from what Uthmaan as-Saalimee and Jameel al-Haamilee have transmitted – that they showed Shaikh Fawzaan some of the terms of the pact and that he supported Muhammad al Imaam and said:

بما أنها قد وقعت انتهى الأمر

“Because it has already occurred, the affair has ended”

And that he said,

إن الشيخ محمد الإمام هو أعرف بحاله أي حال البلاد

“Indeed Shaikh Muhammad al Imaam is more knowledgeable about his situation”

And that he said,

وبما أن الشيخ محمد قد وقع على هذه الوثيقة فهو أمر مطلوب حفاظا على الدعوة والدماء والأعراض

“Because Shaikh Muhammad has signed this pact, then this is something which is desired to preserve the da’wah, the blood (of the people), and their honor”

“I (Shaikh Abdullah bin Sulfeeq adh-Dhafeeri) say: (Even) If they were truthful in their transmission, then they didn’t present to Shaikh Saalih Fawzaan the entire pact.  If they had shown Shaikh Fawzaan the entire pact along with what has become clear lately from the positions of Muhammad al Imaam regarding the “Decisive Storm” (military strikes), the Shaikh (Fawzaan) would have rejected this pact.  And how could Shaikh Fawzaan agree to its terms while it contains what it contains of calamities and misrepresentation of the (correct) beliefs?” (p.13 in the pdf viewer)

(end of what was translated from that treatise)

Shaikh Rabee on Saudi’s war against the Houthis:

https://sughayyirah.wordpress.com/2015/09/03/shaikh-rabee-on-saudis-war-against-the-houthi-raafidhah/

Footnotes

[1] Part of Shaikh Rabee’s praise for Shaikh Abdullah bin Sulfeeq adh-Dhafeeri and one of his books can be found here: http://www.rabee.net/ar/articles.php?cat=7&id=214

[2] The name of Saudi Arabia’s military operation: عَاصِفَة الحزم

Some of the Statements of the Scholars on Muhammad al Imam and the Pact he signed with the Shi’a

File can be downloaded from here:

Some of the statements of the Scholars on Muhammad al Imaam and the pact he signed with the Shia

Refutations of Tahir Wyatt

 

 

Shaikh Rabee on Tahir Wyatt 3 years ago:

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=12547

“After I studied this matter, I found that he (i.e. Tahir Wyatt) was refuting Salafees in the West and harming them, and he would accompany those who were splitting the ranks of the Salafees. And recently some articles have been posted on Kulasalafiyyeen[1] relating to this matter. These things are an indication of something. The next matter is that he refused to speak about Abul-Hasan al-Ma`ribee, but his soul allows him to rebuke Salafees. How is it easy for him to attack Salafees here and there and he finds it difficult to speak a word of truth about Abul-Hasan al-Ma`ribee.  If he (i.e. Tahir Wyatt) was a Salafee, then this would not be his condition.“

 

Under the advice of some of the Scholars, 3 years ago, some students wrote a comprehensive response to Tahir Wyatt, Muhammad Akhtar Chaudry, and Nadir Ahmed unveiling the reality of madeenah.com and fatwa-online (most articles can be downloaded at this link):

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=12297

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/uploads/madeenah-com-students-1.pdf

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/uploads/madeenah-com-students-2.pdf

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/uploads/madeenah-com-students-3.0.pdf

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/uploads/madeenah-com-students-3.1.pdf

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/uploads/madeenah-com-students-3.2.pdf

 

 

More recently, the student Abu Hafsah Khashif Khan on Tahir Wyatt:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4QX3TWFaTk

 

 

 

http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/articles/nrnfu-tahir-wyatt-shadeed-muhammad-and-the-nation-of-islam.cfm

http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/articles/mqwsb-tahir-wyatt-shadeed-muhammad-and-the-nation-of-islam-part-2.cfm

http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/articles/feoja-tahir-wyatt-shadeed-muhammad-and-the-nation-of-islam-part-3.cfm

http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/articles/xzuhc-tahir-wyatt-shadeed-muhammad-and-the-nation-of-islam-part-4.cfm

 

 

 

 

Some of the Reasons Why (a brother) Recanted From the Manhaj of Al-Hajuri

 

http://www.alhajuri.com/articles/vuvghdt-some-of-the-reasons-why-i-recanted-from-the-manhaj-of-al-shaykh-al-hajuri.cfm

 

 

Stay Away from Tahir Wyatt

 

The student Abu Hafsah Kashif Khan on Tahir Wyatt:

 

 

Summary of Some of the Major Errors of Yahya al Hajooree

This is a brief document taken from:

http://www.salafitalk.com/threads/1617-A-United-Word-From-Ahlus-Sunnah-in-Britain-Regarding-Yahyaa-al-Hajooree?p=2743#post2743

containing a summary of some of the major mistakes of Yahya al Hajooree, some of the names of some of the scholars who have spoken against him, and the names of the Salafi centers and masjids in England which endorse this document (as well as www.troid.ca as is mentioned at the link)

 

File: Yahyaa Bayaan English Final 8

 

 

Also see:

https://sughayyirah.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/from-march-13-2013-shaikh-rabee-on-yahyaa-al-hajooree/

 

From March 13 2013 Shaikh Rabee on Yahyaa al Hajooree

Text (translated):

http://dusunnah.com/s20-methodology/c45-innovation-and-its-people/people-of-doubt-groups-and-innovators/we-have-remained-patient-for-7-years-with-yahya-al-hajoori-shaykh-rabee-ibn-hadee-al-madkhalee/

Audio:

http://sunnahpublishing.net/al-allaamah-rabee-ibn-haadee-al-madkhalee-on-yahyaa-al-hajooree-and-his-followers/

Some of his errors:

http://www.salafitalk.com/entries/43-Our-Position-Towards-Shaikh-Yahyah-al-Hajooree-amp-His-Followers

 

Shaikh Ahmad an Najmee and Shaikh Muhammad ibn Haadee on Ibn Jibreen

 

The following taken from:

 

http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=130284

 

Shaikh Ahmad an Najmee’s speech about Ibn Jibreen

 

Some of the text of the Shaikh’s speech:

 

 

السائل :بلغنا عن الشيخ عبد الله بن جبرين أنكم تقولون أنه ليس من أهل السنة والجماعة وبعض الناس يقول لا هو من أهل السنة والجماعة ,نريد منكم كلام يا شيخ وجزاكم الله خيراً ؟

 

The Questioner says:

It is reached us regarding Shaikh Abdullah ibn Jibreen that you have said that he is not from Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa’ah.  Some of the people say: No, he is from Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa’ah.  We would like some clarification from you O Shaikh – (we ask that) Allah reward you with good

 

 

العلامة النجمي : ابن جبرين ,إخواني ,إخواني ,إخواني ,

[كلام غير واضح بين السائل والشيخ , ثم قال :وكتبه ياشيخ ]

ثم قال رحمه الله :ليس من أهل المنهج الصحيح السائل جزاكم الله خير .اهـ المقطع الأول

 

Al Allaamah Shaikh Ahmad an Najmee replied:

Ibn Jibreen is Ikhwaani, Ikhwaani, Ikhwaani

[some unclear speech between the questioner and the Shaikh, then the questioner says: And his books, O Shaikh]

Shaikh Ahmad an Najmee – rahimahullah – replied:

He is not from the people of the correct methodology

Questioner: Jazaakumullahu khair (end of first audio part )

(End of that part)

 

السائل :هل صحيح أنكم بدعتم الشيخ ابن جبرين ؟

Questioner: Is it true that you declared Shaikh Ibn Jibreen an innovator?

العلامة النجمي : الشيخ ابن جبرين يا جماعة ,هو إخواني ,إخواني محترق كما يقال ,وبعدين أنا أبغاكم تقرؤون كتاب [رد الجواب ] وإذا رأيتم فيه شيء من الخطأ قولوا لنا .ويعلم الله عالم الغيب والشهادة أني ما رددت عليه ذلك الرد إلا غيرة على التوحيد , و – يعني – نصراً للحق,نعم والحقيقة ابن جبرين ظهر أمره ,أمره ظاهر ,نعم

Al Allaamah Shaikh Ahmad an Najmee:

Shaikh Ibn Jibreen, O Jamaa’ah, he is Ikhwaani, a flaming Ikhwaani as it is said.  And I would like you to read the book:

Returning a Reply to the one who requested me not to print my book¹

And if you see any mistakes in the book, let me know.

And Allah knows, He is the All-Knower of the unseen and the seen, that I did not reply with that reply except because of concern for tawheed – meaning – helping the truth.

The reality is that Ibn Jibreen has exposed his affair, his affair is apparent, na’am

Translated by Ummu Khadijah

(Footnotes)

1By Shaikh Ahmad an Najmee.  The English translation can be downloaded from this link: http://salaf-us-saalih.com/al-ibaanah-com/ scroll down about 2/3 of the page until you see: Al-Ibaanah.com» E-Books , then click on: Returning a Reply to the one who Requested me not to Print my Book – Shaikh Ahmad bin Yahyaa An-Najmee

 

A link to the Arabic book is available at the sahab link

The Scholars on Ihyaa Turaath and Abdur Rahman Abdul Khaaliq

This is a collection of the statements of the ulama regarding both Jam’iyyah Ihyaa Turaath and Abdur Rahman Abdul Khaaliq taken from:

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=5220

and

http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=117024

The statements of such scholars as:

Shaikh Muhammad Saalih Uthaymeen

Shaikh Albanee

Shaikh Muqbil

Shaikh Rabee

Shaikh Ubaid al Jaabiree

Shaikh Ahmad Subayee

and more

Download the file from here:

The Scholars on Ihyaa Turaath and Abdur Rahman Abdul Khaaliq